Phone: 800-862-8529                                                          Fax: 509-545-0909
Weather |  Market News |  Headline News |  DTN Ag Headlines |  AgBizDir.com |  Crops |  Futures |  Portfolio |  Futures Markets |  Quotes 
 
  Home  
  Producer Account Login  
  About Us  
  PNW Charts  
  Daily Commentary  
  Real Time Quotes  
  Calendar  
  Contact Us  
  Tri Cities Grain Photo Gallery  
  LDP  
  Administrative Login  
 
 
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Process, Resolve Tested in Nuke Talks  07/07 06:21

   VIENNA (AP) -- Iran nuclear talks were in danger of busting through their 
second deadline in a week Tuesday, raising questions about the ability of world 
powers to cut off all Iranian pathways to a bomb through diplomacy, and testing 
the resolve of U.S. negotiators to walk away from the negotiation as they've 
threatened.

   As the latest target date arrived for a deal setting a decade of 
restrictions on Iran's nuclear program, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, 
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and other top diplomats huddled 
in Vienna in search of a breakthrough. All have spoken of deep differences 
remaining even after 11 days of discussions, and there was no public indication 
they had resolved disputes ranging from inspection rules on suspicious Iranian 
sites to limits on Tehran's research and development of advanced nuclear 
technology.

   Diplomats extended their discussions by a week when they missed their goal 
of a pact by June 30, after passing previous deadlines in July 2014 and last 
November. For Kerry and his team, pressure is increasing from skeptical U.S. 
allies and members of Congress. If the accord isn't sent over to American 
lawmakers by Thursday, their month-long review period would be doubled to 60 
days, hampering the ability of the Obama administration to offer speedy 
economic benefits to Iran for nuclear concessions.

   In Tehran Tuesday, Iran's Atomic Energy Organization declared it had reached 
a "general understanding" in parallel talks with the U.N. nuclear agency on 
"joint cooperation." The Iranians have made similar claims previously, and it 
was unclear if any process was established for the International Atomic Energy 
Agency's long-stymied investigation of past nuclear weapons work by the Islamic 
Republic --- a demand of Washington and its partners in negotiations in 
Austria's capital.

   There, in a baroque, 19th-century palace, Kerry gathered early Tuesday with 
the foreign ministers of Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia. The larger 
group was to meet with Zarif afterward, with the clock ticking. Russia's Sergey 
Lavrov and China's Wang Yi were expected for a gathering of emerging economies 
in the Russian city of Ufa on Wednesday, and White House spokesman Josh Earnest 
said another prolongation of talks was "certainly possible."

   The U.S. is in a tough spot. President Barack Obama has expended significant 
political capital on finalizing an agreement that has prompted suspicion from 
Iran's regional rival, Saudi Arabia, outright hostility from America's closest 
Mideast ally, Israel, and deep ambivalence even among Obama's Democratic allies 
in Congress. They're concerned that the accord would leave Iran's nuclear 
infrastructure largely intact and compel the West to provide the leading 
U.S.-designated state sponsor of terrorism with potentially hundreds of 
billions of dollars' worth of economic relief from international sanctions.

   To ease their concerns, Obama and Kerry have vowed to hold out for a "good 
deal" that verifiably keeps Iran at least a year away from a nuclear weapons 
capability for at least a decade. Current intelligence estimates put the 
Iranians only two to three months away from amassing enough material for a 
nuclear warhead, if they pursued such a course. As part of the guarantee, the 
administration has repeatedly threatened to abandon negotiations if they prove 
fruitless or appear as an Iranian stall for time.

   On-and-off talks with Tehran have been going on for more than a decade, 
though this incarnation has come closest to any resolution. The latest effort 
began in secret a couple of years ago and gained speed after the election of 
moderate-leaning Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in 2013. By November that 
year, Iran and the six world powers clinched an interim nuclear agreement and 
began the process for a comprehensive accord.

   Over the weekend, a cautious Kerry told reporters that talks on the final 
package "could go either way."

   "If we don't have a deal, if there's absolute intransigence, if there's an 
unwillingness to move on the things that are important, President Obama has 
always said we'll be prepared to walk away," Kerry said. "It's not what anybody 
wants. We want to get an agreement. But I've said from the moment I became 
involved in this we want a good agreement, only a good agreement, and we're not 
going to shave anywhere at the margins in order just to get an agreement."

   But a withdrawal won't happen necessarily if the diplomacy fails, a senior 
U.S. official said. "There are a range of possibilities, and I think to some 
extent it depends on where things actually stand," said the official, who 
updated reporters this weekend on the private talks on condition he not be 
quoted by name. "If things are I think exceedingly close, I think that puts us 
in one category of possible options. If things really just break down and it's 
clear there's no way of getting there that anybody can see, I think that puts 
us in another place."

   Republicans hostile to compromise with Iran have been urging the U.S. to 
pull back from the talks. Their refrain for several months has been that Obama 
and Kerry want a deal more than the Iranians do, and have let red lines erode 
on Iranian enrichment capacity, inspections and providing limited sanctions 
relief. The president and his top advisers vehemently reject such claims.

   Iran has its own red lines, defiantly outlined in recent weeks by Ayatollah 
Ali Khamenei, the nation's supreme leader. They include a quick easing of 
sanctions, and rejection of any inspections of military sites or interviews 
with Iranian nuclear scientists.

   On Monday, a senior Iranian official also demanded an end to the U.N. arms 
embargo against his country as part of any deal. The Iranian decision to 
publicly bring the issue into the mix suggested disputes ran deeper than just 
over the most widely aired matters. The U.S. wants to maintain restrictions on 
some conventional weapons and ballistic missiles as it seeks to limit Tehran's 
Mideast influence.


(KA)


 
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN